Scanners (1981) Review

scannersPoster

“You are 35 years old, Mr. Vale.  Why are you a derelict?  Such a piece of human junk?  The answer is simple: you are a scanner.”

David Cronenberg has had a remarkable career by any measure.  His unique combination of grisly genre delights and high-minded meditations on identity, consciousness, the body-mind dichotomy, and transformation have remained constant throughout his extensive filmography.  Scanners, Cronenberg’s seventh film, is, in some ways, the most conventional of his early films in the way that it adheres to thriller tenets, yet it’s still a thrilling, powerful film that uniquely anticipates much of the sci-fi Reagan-era anxiety that manifested in cyberpunk.

It also has the most badass head explosion in the history of film.

headAsplosion

The head explosion that launched a thousand gifs

In the future, some humans have developed telepathic abilities, known as “scanning.”  Scanning, it seems, at least at its most innocuous level, brings on nosebleeds and an upset stomach – sounds like the aftermath of a night out.  Most latent scanners stumble about, homeless, solitary, lost, due to the overwhelming nature of having your mind subjected to the constant cacophony of other human’s thoughts.  Some, however, have refined their ability and learned to control the chaos in their heads.  Of course, mental powers would be highly prized in military and security, so corporation ConSec has invested in a program led by Dr. Paul Ruth (Patrick McGoohan in kind of bearded professor X role, although his professor X here is working for the man) to develop scanners into weapons.  When a demonstration of scanning results in the above head-explosion disaster at the hands of a renegade scanner named Revok, Dr. Ruth sets out to recruit a new scanner to infiltrate Revok’s group.

scanners1

Scanners is PK Dick filtered through Cronenberg’s mind – a film about corporate distrust, paranoia, and alienation, hung in a thriller framework.  Hero Cameron Vale (a wooden, relatively empty Stephen Lack – the emptiness perhaps deliberate on Cronenberg’s part, as Vale has been living in a hell of inescapable voices or isolation for his entire life) is a broken man when we first meet him, but even later after Ruth’s tutelage, he still feels dangerous and unpredictable, somewhat like Case from William Gibson’s 1984 classic Neuromancer.  This is a film of admirable greys, both in terms of its monolithic corporate entities and landscapes and the character’s motivations, morality, and ethics.  Nothing here feels simple and Manichean.  We identify with Vale because we all feel a bit lost, alienated, unsure.  It’s fitting that the film’s climactic clash between Vale and Revok ends ambivalently.  Someone has won the day, but the future and moral ground is no less shaky than it was at the beginning.

Of course, being an early Cronenberg film, there’s plenty of violence and body horror in this mutant noir.  Blood seeps from bulging veins, heads morph and pulse.  While scanner battles really equate to a lot of gurning for the camera, Cronenberg makes it work with those lovely practical effects.

scanners2

As noted earlier, Stephen Lack’s performance is adequate but not particularly inspiring.  Michael Ironsides is as great as ever, though, as the sinister Revok.  PatrickMcGoohan also makes a great impression as the vaguely Dr. Frankensteinesque Dr. Ruth, and  Robert Silverman is wonderfully weird as the troubled artist Benjamin Peirce.  Like most of Cronenberg films, Scanners has a magnificent Howard Shore score.  It’s an ominous, epic, operatic affair constructed from strings and icy droning synths.  This is a cold film, and Howard’s score amplifies and enhances Mark Irwin’s chilly cinematography.

scanners3

Scanners is a great film.  While it’s not strictly a horror film, there’s more than enough blood and heads exploding to keep any horror fan interested.  Cronenberg would go on to make weirder, slicker films, but Scanners still feels vital, smart, and has aged extremely well.  Highly recommended.

9/10

7 thoughts on “Scanners (1981) Review

  1. Nice review 🙂 exceptionally pleased to see the mention of Shore’s score – I love it 🙂 he and Cronenberg were good collaborators.

    Seeing that head explosion in gif form really highlights how bad arse it is!

    I wanna watch this now!!!! 🙂

  2. Definitely best head explosion ever and if you haven’t seen the story behind how the FX team pulled it off, it’s definitely worth watching (It’s a special feature on the Blu-ray release but I think it’s still pretty easy to find on YouTube too). They weren’t able to pull off making Lack a better actor, but in my opinion, his performance is now just part of the movie’s charm.

  3. A good review of a movie I think has been overlooked. I enjoyed “Scanners”. I’m not sure if mutants fit into the horror, SF or fantasy genre, but I think the horrible (good) effects put Scanners firmly in the horror category. Horror fans don’t want to come away without some organic matter splashed in their faces. Cronenberg’s exploration of mutants as outsiders is a harbinger of what was to come. Although scanners and X-men can be dangerous, I think even benign mutants, say healers or seers, would find themselves hunted. Anything unknown or unusual tends to scare us.

  4. I’ve been a fan of Scanners since first viewing. I definitely agree that Patrick McGoohan & Michael Ironside elevate the film. It did seem to me an early movie attempt at adapting popular comic book concepts of that era. I think it is Cronenberg’s most approachable work. Scanners & Videodrome top my list of many Cronenberg favorites.

  5. Great review, this is one of my favourite Conenberg films. Actually, it was on TV one evening recently, haven’t seen it in ages, and I still feel the story and amazing effects stand up really well. Brilliant film!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s